Sahara Chief Mr. Subrata Roy is showing his willingness to repay and the company is appealing to the judicial system to consider the proposal. Why so stubborn behavior for the parivaar?
The company in every aspect has always worked for the upbringing of the society. Why it will not give transparency to its own investors, I don’t think there is any need of running away, as every dimensions of the company is doing well and has equivalent profits.
Who doesn't have ups and downs in life? Every problem can be sorted out by finding solutions. Why the proposals is not being accepted. Mr. Subrata Roy has done so much for the company, and now he is framed with allegations.
I don’t understand, investors have signed after agreeing all the terms and conditions and none of them has complained till date, then why now such a huge fuss and venom for the group?
Every issue can be resolved then why not this? Sahara Chief has willingly surrendered and requested for the apologies of not appearing before the court. He has only asked for some time, If SEBI wanted then this issue can be sorted out long back.
In its order dated 4th February, 2014, the Supreme Court itself granted liberty to Sahara “for mentioning the matters for preponement of the date if a concrete and acceptable proposal can be offered in the meantime”. However, when Sahara came up with a proposal and mentioned the matter for preponement of the date, in full allegiance to the said order, the Supreme Court astonishingly got infuriated and termed the mentioning as its ‘insult’. Is the court not in contempt of itself?
No comments:
Post a Comment